Against Bailout of the Few
Nothing is being said about where some of this Wall Street bailout money should be going. This is an issue of criminal
proportions and I say that because subpoenas and investigations by the FBI have already begun. We can never call
this a rescue plan. Rescue is a word used to help someone in need of basic necessities—not someone that is full of
greed. I believe we should all demand that the president, congress and the senate give their undivided attention and
support to the people that are paying for all this mess. Our representatives need to put one dollar into social security
funds for every dollar given to these financial entities. They need to do the same for Veterans’ benefits, college
education loans, medical coverage for children, the victims of hurricane Katrina, Medicare, Medicaid and secure funds
to make unemployment benefits available for the duration of the collapsed economy.
But how can we pressure these so-called representatives of the taxpayer? You know, the representatives that swore
to never tax us without representing us. In the past, taxation without representation was the common phrase used to
describe this kind of criminal behavior, as they did during the Boston Tea Party. People back then just blatantly
refused to pay the tax. Is this what we feel like doing now?
I would never tell you to stop paying taxes because it is against the law for me to say it and for you to do it. But, what if
we all asked for extensions come April 14th 2009 and the flow of money was delayed for a unspecified time? Then, I
think they would see that we mean, pardon the pun, business. Maybe then, congress would consider a real “rescue”
plan for the people. Maybe then, congress would put money in these social programs that so far politicians have failed
to even mention in their campaign speeches. Please don’t tell me after the presidential election that we need to
balance the budget because you spent all the money on the war and saving the rich. Sorry—that is unacceptable.
Maybe they need to face the wrath of the people to keep them honest. And for the record, the mainstream press and
media have been all too complacent about not mentioning the obvious criminal acts of the government. They have
instead only written about the superficial benefits of the few and have purposely tried to avoid the use of the word
bailout because it has negative connotations. The media has forgotten to write about the overall consequences the
working class people are facing.
It is important to share with all of you why we must demand that money be put into funds that protect working people
and their families. This means the almost non-existent middle class people as well, although they are evaporating
before our very eyes. This goes on as more of the wealthy become the healthy, and the rest of us are getting sicker.
What prompted this article was an op-ed piece written by David S. Scharfstein and Jeremy C. Stein, a professor of
finance at Harvard Business School and a professor of economics at Harvard, respectively. In their article “This
Bailout Doesn’t Pay Dividends,” they state that because Secretary of Treasury Henry Paulson has allowed dividends
on stocks of banks that he and the government have lent billions of dollars, the banks can essentially pay out money to
the officers and directors. In other words, the officers and directors “will be among the leading beneficiaries of the
dividend payouts” and the amount of money paid to them “will amount to approximately $250 million in the first year.”
There is something deeply disturbing about this continued trend, despite public outcry.
I think the taxpayers, the public, and the people have expressed that CEOs and others should not receive bonuses or
golden parachutes while their companies are receiving federal bailout money. Since elected representatives have
stopped listening to us, then we must take action to make them understand we to mean business and not as usual.
And knowing these feelings of disgust, they continue to exercise the same loan policies that got us to this broken
There are other corrections that loan institutions need to make at once. The whole system of predatory lending has
not stopped; it continues with wild abandonment. Some banks are lowering interest rates on home loans in order to
make it possible for the person to make payments. But the value of the home is still way over inflated. Thus, people
still owe more than the house is worth and will eventually walk away from the loan down the road. The other predatory
loans are on cars. People wishing to trade in SUVs that lost most of their value and are upside down, basically owing
more than the car is worth, are being taken advantage of. The balances owed on the SUVs are being added to the new
car they are buying. So the new car is upside down before they drive off the lot. Will car insurance companies cover all
the debt if there is a total lose in an accident? Probably not. How long will it be before people walk away from cars that
are not worth what is owed to the banks? The banking system goes on creating the inevitable crash down the road
and the government and the Secretary of Treasury help them do it over and over again.
I can’t believe that the Secretary of Treasury has not given any guidelines or mandates that the bailout money will not
be used as profit, bonus payments or stock dividends, while taxpayers lose their jobs and fight to make ends meet.
There should be a mandate that stops all predatory loans and puts an end to financial bailout money for the wealthy.
The only conclusion is that this is being done with the knowledge that it is wrong and morally incomprehensible. We
have no recourse but to take action ourselves. Even though we know they can fine us or put liens on our homes. We
realize these problems stem from basic structural flaws in the system.
This profit motive system based on material wealth has degraded us to selfish, greedy rulers of a global economy that
we helped to create and have now plunged it into the unavoidable world depression of the 21st century. The scenario
of the boom bust capitalist system is antiquated and needs to be replaced. The economists of our time must create a
hybrid economy for all of human society that allows profit to be used in conjunction with a type of equilibrium formula
that embraces the basic needs of the global population. We need to veer away from blaming other nations for “taking
our jobs away” and create jobs that all nations can partake in, insuring that their fundamental economic needs are
met, which will slow the immigration explosion dilemma.
Worldwide heads of households, men, women and even children, have been deduced to the source of income figures
by being labeled as good according to the size of their paycheck. There is not an attachment to character, truth,
honesty or fidelity in the end. If your check is small then you are bad or lazy. The fact that every penny earned is given
to the family becomes the paramount measurement of a ‘good provider’ and becomes far more important than the
true expressions of love, compassion, unselfishness and sharing. These all hold little, if any, value at all in a system
where profit is king. Those who earn more money are held to higher levels of respect, far more than those who make
less but essentially work longer, harder hours for their “meager” pay. This is why it seems acceptable to give billions
of taxpayer money to the wealthy institutions, while the fate of the rest of the masses lies in the hands of the heads of
household with no comprehensive federal rescue plan for us.
Is it time for all taxpayers to revolt against the thieves that are giving away our hard earned tax money to the rich,
If so, it is by the pen and not the sword that will lead us to victory.
The excerpt below is from a New York Times article that was printed on October 5, 2008.
To help pay for the rescue, the government should raise taxes on the wealthy, Mr. Buffett suggested. “I’m paying the
lowest tax rate that I’ve ever paid in my life,” he said. “Now, that’s crazy.”
Warren Buffett is one of the richest men in the world. But he is talking about the fake rescue plan; he is really talking
about the Bailout Plan for the rich. He is talking about saving the rich, but he still realizes that he pays a lower tax rate
than most workers.
I believe that all American workers, blue and white collar alike, should stand up for true representation in a way that
the weak elected politicians of our time have so far refused to do.